All PhD students need to include a literature review
in their dissertation. In fact, a review of prior literature is a
prerequisite for any research activity. However, most literature reviews
are badly written and excruciatingly boring. For example, writing about
reviews in the Psychological Bulletin, Bem states that literature reviews
are:
“at risk of producing mind-numbing lists of
citations and findings that resemble a phone book”.
However, there is a growing understanding among
researchers in many disciplines that systematic reviews of the
literature are an important research technique in their own right that:
·
Create
a firm foundation for undertaking new research.
·
Close
areas where no further research is necessary.
·
Uncover
areas where research is needed.
·
Help
with the development of new theories.
The critical difference between standard literature
reviews and systematic literature reviews is that systematic reviews
employ a methodology intended to ensure a comprehensive review of existing
research that is unbiased and replicable. Guidelines for conducting,
reporting and evaluating systematic reviews are available in many
disciplines including Information Systems, medicine, and social policy.
The IASESE School will explain the methodology used in
a systematic review in computer science including:
·
Preparation
of a review protocol
·
Formulating
the review question
·
Search
strategies
·
Quality
Evaluation of studies
·
Data
Extraction
·
Data
Synthesis
·
Reporting
the results
Participants
will have the opportunity to practice preparing a protocol for a
systematic literature review.